High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 02 P&H CK 0033

M/S Yamuna Filling Station vs Union Of India And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 12 February 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jagmohan Bansal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 3035 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 263 words

Jagmohan Bansal, J

1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of decision of respondents No. 3 and 4 to set up Retail Outlet at Plot No. O-32, Old Industrial Area, Panipat.

2.

The grievance of the petitioner is that despite complaints made by it, the respondents-Indian Oil Corporation Limited (in short “corporation”) vide application dated 15.01.2024 (Annexure P-12) followed by letter dated 29.01.2024 (Annexure P-13) has requested Deputy Commissioner, Panipat to issue NOC in terms of Rule 144 of the Petroleum Rules, 2002.

3.

Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the petitioner submits that respondent-corporation is going to set up a petrol pump adjoining the petrol pump of petitioner which is in violation of guidelines issued by State Government. The respondent-corporation is not taking care of complaints made by the petitioner and has applied for NOC.

4.

The respondent-corporation has applied for NOC in terms of Rule 144 of Petroleum Rules, 2002. As per procedure and practice, followed by Deputy Commissioner, he has to seek report from different departments in the form of their opinion as well as objections. Thereafter, the Deputy Commissioner passes an order permitting or denying NOC which is an appealable order. This Court is sanguine of the fact that Deputy Commissioner being duty bound, before passing an order under Rule 144 of the Petroleum Rules, would look into the questions raised by the petitioner who is raising question of violation of guidelines issued by State Government.

5.

In view of above discussion and findings, the petition stands disposed of.