High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 03 PAT CK 0101

M/S K.K. Builder Pvt. Ltd. vs State Of Bihar And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 10 March 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ · S. Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14344, 14551 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 364 words

Heard the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):-

"For refund the deemed assessed excess amount of Rs. 10,05,436/- U/s 68 of the VAT Act, for the assessment period of 2011-12, under the time barred proceeding alongwith statutory interest as per the Section 70 of the VAT Act, 2005 or any other relief(s) as the petitioner is entitled for the claimed amount of refund under the facts and circumstances of the case. The respondent ACST then ACCT, Jhanjharpur Circle could not pass the assessment order within time and now same has become time barred. The C-II and its confirmation alongwith treasury certificate are available with respondents. The C-II amount of Rs. 15,76,627.00 which amount has been deducted from the gross bill of the petitioner by Engineer In Charge and deposited in Govt. Treasury."

Sri Vikash Kumar, S.C. 11 states that during pendency of the present petition, the appropriate authority has passed an order on merits by virtue of which the petitioner would not be entitled to payment of refund so claimed vide Form A-VIII.

It is further submitted that the petitioner had failed to submit his return in terms of the provisions of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005, prompting the officer to initiate the proceeding under Section 27 of the Act. This act is seriously disputed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the statement appears to be actually incorrect, inasmuch as the petitioner had filed the return within the stipulated period as extended by the department.

Well, all these aspects we cannot adjudicate in the present proceeding.

As such, we dispose of the present petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the appropriate authority in accordance with law. If the Appellate Authority finds that the order is totally without jurisdiction, petitioner will be at liberty to prefer a petition before this Court. However, such fact is left open to be adjudicated as and when any such petition is filed. Equally, it shall be open to the petitioner to take recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available in law.

Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.