Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2024) 10 CAT CK 1381

Ms. Jyoti Rani vs The GNCTD & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 16 October 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Sumeet Jerath, Member (A) · Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J)
CASE NUMBER
O.A. No. 2907/2024 with M.A No. 2608/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

43 paragraphs · 2,663 words

ORDER

Hon'ble Dr. Sumeet Jerath, Member (A):

M.A No. 2608/2024 :

As the prayer in the MA for early hearing has been acceded to by hearing the OA today itself, the M.A is disposed of accordingly.

O.A No. 2907/2024 :

The instant OA has been filed by the applicant Ms. Jyoti Rani, under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, seeking the following reliefs :-

"8 (i) Call for the record lying with the respondents pertaining to the issue in question.

(ii)

Quash and set aside the impugned Order No.3067- 70, dt.07.03.2024 (Annexure.A/1) by directing the respondents to appoint the applicant to the post of TGT (English) Female, Post Code-51/21 with all the consequential benefits including the salary, seniority and promotions etc. on the basis of merit position and on par with her co-aspirants who were appointed in due course, in a time bound manner as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem just and proper in the interest of justice.

(iii)

Pass such other or further order (s)/ direction(s) as deem just and proper in the facts & circumstances of the case."

2.

The factual matrix of the case as per the counsel of the applicant is that the applicant was issued an Income and Asset (I & A) Certificate under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category by Tehsildar – Barwala, Govt. of Haryana on 01.03.2021 as under :-

“Certificate No.: EWS/2021/621 Date: 01/03/2021 VALID FOR THE YEAR: 2021-22 This is to certify that Smt JYOTI RANI daughter of Shri SITA RAM wife of Sh. KAMAL permanent resident of House No-57, Street No-NEAR PYARA SUNARA, LandMark BARWALA, Pincode-125121, Town BARWALA, Post Office BARWALA, District HISAR in the State HARYANA Pin Code 125121 whose photograph is attested below belongs to Economically Weaker Sections, since the gross annual income of his/her "Family" is below Rs. 8 lakh (Rupees Eight Lakh only) for the financial year 2020-21, His/Her family does not own or possess any of the following assets***

i.

5 acres of agricultural land and above.

ii.

Residential flat of 1000 sq. ft. and above.

iii.

Residential plot of 100 sq. yards and above in notified municipalities.

iv.

Residential plot of 200 sq. yards and above in areas other than the notified municipalities.

2.

SmI JYOTI RANI belongs to the 'ARORA' caste which is not recognized as a Scheduled Caste, Schedule Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Central List).

Issued by Tehsildar, BARWALA”

3.

This Certificate as the heading stated was valid for Fiscal year 2021-22. On 27.05.2021 the respondents notified the vacancy notice vide Advertisement No. 03/21 with opening and closing date as 04.06.2021 & 03.07.2021 respectively which was extended vide Notice dated 02.07.2021, from 03.07.2021 to 10.07.2021. The applicant applied online for the same under the EWS category well within time and appeared in the Computer Based Examination on 14.09.2021. Having scored more than the cut-off marks under the EWS category, the applicant uploaded her e-dossier within the stipulated time. Being qualified, the applicant was issued offer of Appointment to the post of TGT English-Female, Post Code – 51/21 on 26.10.2022. Pursuant to the same she accepted the offer of appointment on 02.11.2022 and submitted attestation form and all essential documents which were verified also. However, a Deficiency Memo was issued to the applicant with respect to her EWS certificate by the respondent no. 2 with a direction to rectify the deficiencies within 15 days, which she did on 09.11.2022. But, she was not appointed even after several verbal and written representations. Later, vide communication dated 07.03.2024, the candidature of the applicant was rejected though, the same was served to her in the last week of April. Learned counsel of the applicant averred that vide letter dated 22.05.2024 the State of Haryana requested the respondents to accept the EWS Certificate issued before 01.04.2021 for the financial year 2021-22 in favour of the candidates from Haryana as genuine and to appoint them, but to no avail. Hence the present OA.

4.

Learned counsel of the applicant based his arguments on the following grounds :-

“5.1.

Because, it is not in dispute that the applicant belongs to the EWS Category and is in possession of a genuine EWS Certificate that is valid for the requisite financial year 2021-22.

5.2.

Because, there is no mention in the relevant paras of the advertisement/RR i.e. para 5(ii), 6(ii) & 8(viii) or even in para 5.2 to 5.4 of the DOPT OM dt.31.01.2019 that the EWS Certificate should be issued between 01.04.2021 to 03.07.2021, what has been reiterated in all these documents that the crucial date for submitting income and asset certificate by the candidate may be treated as the closing date for receipt of the application for the post. Therefore, the grounds for rejection of the applicant's candidature, that too after issuance of Offer of Appointment & its acceptance, is extraneous, perverse, discriminatory and arbitrary, hence illegal.

5.3.

Because, the Chief Secretary, State of Haryana have clarified that the EWS Certificates issued to the applicant is valid for the Financial Year 2021-22.

5.4.

Because, since, the applicant possesses the requisite qualifications and is fully eligible for appointment to the post in question, hence, deserve appointment with all the consequential benefits on the basis of merit position.

5.5.

Because, in view of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Tagin Litin Case (Supra) and in the eventuality that the offer of appointment issued by the competent authority has been duly accepted by the applicant, the appointment is complete. Therefore, benefits of appointment will follow.

5.6.

Because, the impugned action of the respondents is discriminatory in denying appointment to the applicant and in appointing the similarly situated employees who also belongs to the state of Haryana like the applicant and are in possession of the like certificates bearing a date of issuance prior to 01.04.2021 and their certificates are valid for the financial year 2021-22 like the applicants. The documents received under RTI Act, [Annexure.A/13(Colly.)] apparently establishes that the respondents are acting in discriminatory manner, that is bad in the eyes of law.

5.7.

Because, the respondent no.2 cancelled appointment of the applicant that amounts to termination without issuing show cause notice and in conflict with the protection provided under Article 311 of the constitution and has resulted in civil consequences like taking away the source of livelihood that is a facet of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. That can't be done without adhering to the principle of natural justice. Hence the impugned orders / actions of the respondents are bad in the eyes of law.”

He also averred that this is a covered matter in terms of the ratio given by the Judgment given by the Coordinate Bench in OA No. 2486/2022 on 14.12.2023 in case of Ms. Kiran Grover vs. AIIMS and Recruitment Cell of AIIMS which was upheld by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in WP(C) No. 10057/2024 and CM Appl.- dated 23.07.2024.

5.

However, the learned counsel of the respondents opposed the above arguments of the counsel of the applicant and submitted that the cancellation of candidature of the applicant was done as per the directions in the U.O. Note bearing No.F.19(07)/2020/S-IV/226 dated 05/02/2024 of the Dy. Secretary, Services IV Branch, and the EWS certificate was issued before the start of financial year and after the cut-off date such applications are not valid. The EWS certificate submitted by the candidate Ms. Jyoti Rani was issued by the Tehsildar, Barwala on 01/03/2021 valid for year 2021-22 which was not considered valid as the financial year 2021-22 is taken as from 1st April, 2021 to 31st March, 2022 and the EWS Certificate was issued before the start of the financial year. The contents of the U.O. Note bearing No.F.19(07)/2020/S-IV/226 dated 05/02/2024 are reproduced under:-

“The matter under reference is regarding "Proposal to decide on the issue of validity/applicability of the EWS Certificate issue after cut-off date with validity for the year 2021-22 and also the EWS Certificate issued before cut-off date (but between the period year 2021-22 in the context of various post of TGTS (Male/Female). The Administrative Department had submitted the file for the approval of Hon'ble Lt. Governor as proposed at para 15(A) on page 6/N. Chief Secretary (Delhi) has marked the file to Services Department with the remark "Services Department to examine this matter as per rules relevant. Before sending the same to the Hon'ble Lt. Governor, Delhi.”

6.

Heard the learned counsel of both the sides ; examined the documents on record and perused the relevant judgments of Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal; Hon’ble Delhi High Court and the Hon’ble Supreme Court. This Tribunal has observed that the I & A Certificate under the EWS category was issued by Tehsildar – Barwala, Govt. of Haryana on 01.03.2021 during financial year 2020-2022 but the heading at the top of the Certificate stated that it is valid for financial year 2021-2022. This was later clarified by a general letter No. 22/229/2023-3HR-III dated 22.05.2024 written by Chief Secretary, Govt. of Haryana to Chief Secretary – Govt. of Delhi ; Secretary – Govt. of Delhi, Education Department ; Secretary – DSSSB and Director – Directorate of Education on the subject – Regarding EWS Certificates submitted by the candidates of Haryana selected as TGT by DSSSB stating as follows :-

“2 Government of Haryana wishes to express its deep concern about the withdrawal of appointment letters in many cases and the prospects thereof in some cases still under consideration of Directorate of Education of Delhi Government, of meritorious youth of Haryana, The Government of Haryana after meticulous consideration of the issues clarifies that the candidature of the candidates cannot be cancelled merely on any one or more of the grounds stated above because of the following reason :-

(i)

The EWS certificates in Haryana are issued keeping in view the average fixed income and assets for the complete financial year, immediately upon an application being made to the competent authority, no matter what the date of application whether or not before completion of the financial year Therefore, the EWS certificates issued before the completion of the financial year 2020-21, le during the period between 1st January and Stat March 2021, submitted by the candidates who are covered under 1(i) above should be treated valid for the year 2021-22.

(ii)

Regarding acceptance of EWS Certificate issued by the Naib Tehsildar instead of Tehsildar submitted by the applicants/candidates of Haryana it is clarified that-

(a)

Haryana Government in the Schedule to Right to Service Act, 2014 has authorized both Tehsildar and Naib-Tehsildar to issue EWS Certificates to the persons residing in Haryana.

(b)

In another case of similar nature, it has already been clarified by Haryana Government vide letter No. 22/227/2023-3HR-III, dated 7th December 2023 (Copy enclosed) addressed to UPSC/DoPT that State Government has decided to treat the EWS certificates issued by the Naib-Tehsildar as true and genuine. In fact, such EWS certificates issued by the Naib Tehsildar have also been accepted by UPSC/DOPT.

(c)

in CWP 8502 of 2017 (O&M) it has been held by the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court that “...The power and duties of Tehsildar and Naib Tehsildar are of similar nature. The Tehsildars and Naib Tehsildars have powers of Executive Magistrate to maintain law and order. Their powers and functions include Maintenance and Updating Revenue Record, Registration of documents and recovery of Government dues. Therefore, experience/service rendered as Naib Tehsildar and Tehsildars is similar.”

Therefore, EWS certificates issued by Naib Tehsildar for candidates of Haryana referred to at 1(ii) above should be treated as valid.

(i)

Regarding applicants/candidates who are covered under 1(iii) above, it is informed that Haryana Government launched income certificates generation via the portal https://saralharyana.gov.in during the year 2021-22 to issue online certificates of all kinds including Caste Certificates/Income Certificates/EWS Certificates etc. which were previously being issued by different relevant Departments of Haryana Government. It is also clarified here that in the previous system it would have been possible for a candidate to obtain two different EWS Certificates verifying the income at two different levels by approaching the relevant Department with two different sets of affidavits at two different dates. With the launch of the said portal this possibility has been completely pre-empted. There is a unique Family ID for every family and the verified annual income of every family for every year is available in the State level database. The moment a candidate applies for EWS Certificate on the SARAL portal, it fetches the income and caste data from the said database. There is no scope for the competent authority (Tehsildar or Nailb-Tehsildar etc.) to make any change to the verified income of the previous year. Therefore, in this system, the candidate may generate his certificate in any of the months. Many candidates who submitted the EWS certificate issued after the last date of submission of application might not have been aware of the newly launched portal by Haryana Government and consequently, they may not have been able to generate their own EWS Certificate in time. It is, therefore, requested that the EWS Certificate generated after the last date for the candidates referred to at 1 (iii) above may also be accepted because they truly capture the actual verified income for the previous year. It is further added that no cut-off date need be fixed for the purpose of Caste Certificate of candidates of reserved category because caste stays the same at all times. Similarly, the verified family income of the candidates residing in Haryana is available in the database on an annual basis at all times and remains unchanged for a particular period in the financial year. Therefore, the mere fact of submission of EWS Certificate which was issued after the cut off date cannot legally be treated as valid ground for cancellation of candidature.

In view of the above, you are requested to consider the EWS Income and Asset Certificates issued by the Competent Authority during the period between 1" January and 31 March 2021, before or after the last date as valid and allow the respective candidates to continue/join back their duties. It is also requested that a similar decision may also be taken for all other selected candidates of Haryana having similar EWS Certificates, where cases for cancellation of candidature/withdrawal of appointment letter are in pipeline in Directorate of Education or any other department of Delhi Government on any of the grounds mentioned in para 1 above.

If required, Government of Haryana can depute the Director General, Human Resources, Haryana to meet with the Director of Education or any other authority to work out the details of all the candidates of Haryana whose appointment may be in process of cancellation and provide any further detailed justification for each case wherever felt necessary by him.”

7.

This Tribunal has also gone through the judgment of the Coordinate Bench in OA No. 2486/2022 dated 14.12.2023 which was upheld by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in W.P. No. 10057/2024 and CM Appl.- dated 23.07.2024 and have come to the conclusion that this Judgment gives force and momentum to the case of the applicant.

8.

In the light of the above, we are of the considered opinion that this OA has merit and deserves to be allowed. We accordingly quash and set aside the impugned order No.DE.3 (38)DRC(E-III)/TGT(English)/Female/2022/EWS(pf-4)/3067-70 dated 07.03.2024 and direct the respondents to verify the admissibility of the Income & Asset Certificate issued by Tehsildar, Barwala within a period of 30 days and thereafter if the Certificate is found admissible as per rules and regulations on the subject, consider issuing offer of appointment to the applicant within 45 days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. The applicant would be entitled to all consequential benefits like seniority and promotion on notional basis. However, there will be no payment of arrears of pay and allowances.

9.

With the above directions, this OA is disposed of with no order as to costs.