High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 02 GUJ CK 0068

M/S Bhumi Associate vs Union Of India Through The Secretary

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 18 February 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.B.Pardiwala, J · Ilesh J. Vora, J
CASE NUMBER
R/Special Civil Application No. 2426, 2515, 2618, 3196 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 542 words

J.B.Pardiwala, J

1.

Pursuant to the our order dated 16th February 2021, the officers of the DGGI, Surat namely, (1) Dr. Satish Dhavale, (2) Shri Pramod Kumar, (3)

Shri BBL Verma, (4) Shri Yogin B. Vyas, (5) Shri Ajay Kumar Tomar, (6) Shri R.K. Mishra, (7) Shri Yogesh Shaw, (8) Shri Kishore Upadhyay, (9)

Shri B.S. Rathod, and (10) Shri Abhinav Chaowdhary, have joined the video conference.

Dr. Satish Dhavale, the Additional Director General, Surat, took the lead when the officers were called upon to respond to the writ applications

which have been filed complaining of the undue harassment etc.

We inquired with Dr. Satish Dhavale as to whether he is aware of the developments that have taken place over a period of time. According to Dr.

Satish Dhavale, an appropriate inquiry has been initiated and the allegations which have been levelled in all the writÂapplications shall be looked into

by an appropriate authority.

2.

Mr. Devang Vyas, the learned Additional Solicitor General of India, submitted that as this Court is inclined to issue few directions as noted in the

order dated 16th February 2021, such directions will have to be issued to the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs [CBIC]. It is pointed out

by Mr. Vyas that the CBIC is not a party respondent in any of the writÂ​applications and he will have to discuss the issue with the CBIC.

3.

In view of the above, all the learned counsel appearing in respective writÂapplications shall implead the CBIC as the party respondent in their

respective writÂapplications. The causeÂtitle be amended accordingly. Mr. Devang Vyas, the learned Additional Solicitor General of India, waives

service of notice for and on behalf of the CBIC. Mr. Vyas shall discuss the matter seriously with the highest authority of the CBIC. We put the CBIC

to notice as to why the guidelines as stated in the order dated 16th February 2021 should not be issued by way of Circular/ Instructions.

4.

We have been assured by Dr. Satish Dhavale that there shall not be any further complaint against the officers of the department of undue

harassment, threat, pressure, etc. Dr. Dhavale has assured that the inquiry or investigation that may be undertaken shall be in accordance with law.

5.

We would not have asked the officers to join the video conference but for the serious allegations which have been levelled in the respective writÂ‐

applications. We do not intend to discourage or lower down the morale of all the officers before us. Our endeavour is only to bring it to their notice

that they should act and perform their duties within the four corners of law. They should not take law in their hands. On the contrary, this Court has

always appreciated the efforts put in by the officers in catching hold of fraudsters and all those persons involved in the huge scam of tax evasion etc.

It shall be open for the officers to conduct the search proceedings under SectionÂ​67, but, strictly in accordance with law.

6.

Post these matters for further hearing on 23rd February 2021. On the next date of hearing, the officers shall not join the video conference. Our

message to all the officers before us is loud and clear.