Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2021) 09 DRAT CK 0003

Mr. Pandiyan N. Naidu & Anr vs Authorized Officer, Punjab National Bank

Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 8 September 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Ravi Kumar, Chairperson
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
I.A. No.72 Of 2021 In Appeal on Diary No.424 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 202 words

S. Ravi Kumar, Chairperson

Heard Advocates for parties through Video Conference.

1.

This application is filed to condone delay of 31 days in preferring the appeal.

2.

Advocate for Applicants submitted that Applicants approached Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in view of the pandemic situation and Writ was pending till August before the High Court and thereafter appeal is filed in the month of August i.e. on 23/08/2021 and that is how the delay is caused.

3.

Advocate for Respondent Bank opposed the application and submitted that delay of 31 days is not correct and according to Bank, delay is 92 days.

4.

I have perused the material papers and the contentions of both parties. There is no dispute that the Applicants approached Hon'ble Gujarat High Court against the very same order and writ was pending there till 06.08.2021.

5.

Considering these aspects and the facts stated in the application, without prejudice to the rights of both parties, I am of the view that delay can be condoned as it is not deliberate . For these reasons, condonation of delay application is allowed and office shall register the appeal if it is otherwise in order.

6.

Application is ordered accordingly.