High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 09 TP CK 0004

Mukunda Kar And Anr vs Digendra Ch. Chanda @ Digendra Chandra @ Shil And Anr.

Tripura High Court · Decided on 5 September 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arindam Lodh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
I.A. 3 Of 2022 In Regular Second Appeal 12 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 164 words

Arindam Lodh, J

Heard Mr. S. Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. SB Debnath, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Also heard Mr. PS Roy, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 90 days in preferring the appeal under Rule 9 of Order XLI of the CPC.

Mr. S. Deb, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicants has submitted that the delay caused in preferring the appeal was unintentional and the reasons for the same have been sufficiently explained in the instant application.

Mr. PS Roy, learned counsel appearing for the respondents did not raise any objection to the said prayer for condonation of delay.

Considering the above submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the parties and after going through the reasons for causing delay, I deem it fit to allow this application.

Accordingly, the delay of 90 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned and the application is allowed and disposed of.