High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 08 UK CK 0142

Mohd. Ibrahim and Mohd. Shakil vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 9 August 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 615 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 209 words

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Shri Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate, present for the applicants.

2.

Shri B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the State.

3.

Shri G.C. Lakhchaura, Advocate, present for the complainant.

4.

Applicants-Mohd. Ibrahim and Mohd. Shakil, who are in jail in connection with crime/FIR No. 112 of 2011, relating to offences punishable u/s 147, 148, 149, 307, 506, 504 I.P.C., Police Station Jaspur District Udham Singh Nagar, have sought their release on bail.

5.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

6.

Learned Counsel for the applicants submitted that other two accused Rashid and Sajid are said to have fired shots at Anees (injured). The role assigned to the applicants is that they were with aforesaid two accused who fired shots.

7.

Having considered submissions of learned Counsel for the parties, and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicants deserve bail.

8.

Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicants Mohd. Ibrahim and Mohd. Shakil be released on bail on executing personal bond by each one of them, and furnishing two sureties for each one of them, each of like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar.