High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 08 UK CK 0163

Mohd Danish vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 28 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1527 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 199 words

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)

Heard Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the accused applicant, and Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State.

The applicant is in jail having been implicated in FIR No. 34 of 2018 for the offences under Sections 366, 376, 120-B, 420, 466, 467, 468, 469, 471 IPC,

registered in the Police Station Kathgodam, District Nainital.

It is contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and the applicant has married the prosecutrix. Applicant is 24 years of

age and the prosecutrix is 19 years old. Applicant is in jail since April, 2018.

Considering the overall materials presently available before this Court, prima facie the applicant has been able to make out a case for bail. The bail

application is allowed accordingly.

Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the Magistrate/Court concerned.

It is made clear that any observation made by this Court is only for the purpose of deciding the present bail application and the same shall not be taken

into consideration at all in any other proceedings.