High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 08 UK CK 0160

Amir vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 28 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1362 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 220 words

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)

Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the accused applicant, and Mr. T.C. Agarwal, AGA for the State.

The applicant is in jail having been implicated in Case Crime No. 140 of 2017 for the offences under Sections 379, 411, 414, 468, 471, 482 IPC,

registered in the Police Station Piran Kaliyar, District Haridwar.

It is contended that the applicant has been false implicated on the basis of the statement of the co-accused and he was not named in the FIR. It is

further contended that the co-accused Dilshad has been granted bail in the present crime and the applicant is also entitled for bail at least on the

ground of parity. Applicant is in jail since 5.6.2018.

Considering the overall materials presently available before this Court, prima facie the applicant has been able to make out a case for bail. The bail

application is allowed accordingly.

Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the Magistrate/Court concerned.

It is made clear that any observation made by this Court is only for the purpose of deciding the present bail application and the same shall not be taken

into consideration at all in any other proceedings.