High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 AP CK 0742

Mohammad Basha vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati · Decided on 5 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Nyapathy Vijay, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 28565 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 366 words

ORDER:

1.

The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the inaction of the Respondent-Authorities in not considering the representations, dated 03.09.2026 and 09.09.2026 of the Petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary.

2.

The facts leading to filing of the present Writ Petition are as follows:-

The Petitioner is working as a Pharmacy Officer at PHC, Bandaluppi, Parvathipuram Manyam District, since 28.03.2022. The Petitioner had submitted an application on 31.05.2025 seeking transfer outside the Tribal Area in the light of the General Transfer Policy issued vide G.O.Ms.No.23, Finance (HR-I-PLG & Policy) Department, dated 15.05.2025, where-under a preference was given to employees who have worked for more than two years in tribal areas. As the application of the Petitioner was not being considered, the Petitioner filed W.P.No.33574 of 2025 before this Court and this Court, taking note of the service of the Petitioner, had directed the Respondents therein to consider the representation of the Petitioner vide its orders dated 03.12.2025.

3.

Consequent thereto, the Petitioner was posted to work at PHC, Kanithi, Visakhapatnam District. Now, the Petitioner submitted representations, dated 03.09.2026 and 09.09.2026, seeking posting at PHC, Bandaluppi, on account of the health condition of his wife and mother. As the representations are not being considered, the present Writ Petition is filed.

4.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the representations given by the Petitioner would be examined by the Respondent-Authorities and an appropriate decision would be communicated to the Petitioner.

5.

Heard Sri Bala Ramesh Yalavarthi, learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Assistant Government Pleader.

6.

Considering the submissions, with the consent of learned counsel appearing on both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, with the following directions:-

(i)

The Respondent-Authorities are directed to consider the representations, dated 03.09.2026 and 09.09.2026, given by the Petitioner and to communicate an appropriate decision to the Petitioner, after taking note of the factual assertion with regard to the health condition of the wife and mother of the Petitioner, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7.

No order as to costs.

8.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.