Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2024) 02 NCLT CK 0016

Mehul Jadavji Shah vs Rohan Developers Pvt Ltd

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 5 February 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.G. Bisht, Member (J) · Prabhat Kumar, Member (T)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
C.P.(IB)373/MB/2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 383 words

C.P.(IB)373/MB/2022

1) Mr. Sagar Vichare, Ld. Counsel for the Financial Creditor and Mr. Akshay Sawant, Ld. Counsel for the Corporate Debtor are present.

2) Ld. Counsel for the Operational Creditor submits that the issue involved in the present Company Petition has been settled out of the Court and the Parties have entered into the Consent Terms on 31.01.2024. Ld. Counsel have placed on record the said Consent Terms dt. 31.01.2024.

3) After referring to the Consent Terms it has been observed that the Financial Creditors and the Corporate Debtor under the present Petition have mutually agreed to amicably resolve and settle their respective disputes, differences and claims and have already arrived at a settlement vide Deed of Settlement dt. 31.01.2024, upon the terms and conditions as more particularly mentioned therein.

4) The Consent Terms further reveals that all the undertakings given by the Parties to the Deed of Settlement, is accepted as the undertaking given before this Bench.

5) In that view of the matter, Counsel for the Parties jointly submits that the Operational Creditor and the Corporate Debtor are abide by the conditions of the Consent Terms dt. 31.01.2024; thus, orally prays for withdrawal of the present Company Petition.

6) Having considered the submissions and upon perusal of Consent Terms, this Bench notes that the matter is settled out of the Court between the Parties and nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present Company Petition; hence, we are not insisting for a Formal Application to have on record for withdrawal of the present Company Petition, thereby mentioning all the aforestated facts.

7) In that view of the matter, oral request for withdrawal of the Company Petition made by Counsel for the Parties is taken into consideration and we allow the withdrawal of the present Company Petition bearing CP (IB) No. 373 of 2022. Resultantly, all the Interlocutory Applications, if any, arising out of the present Company Petition, stand closed, in view of the withdrawal of the above numbered Company Petition.

8) However, the Financial Creditor herein shall have liberty to revive the present Company Petition, in case of breach of the Consent terms by the Corporate Debtor, and proceed with the same in accordance with law, if otherwise permissible.

9) There would however be no order as to Costs. Ordered Accordingly.