Tribunals and CommissionsFull Bench(2024) 04 NGT CK 0012

Meera Thakur vs State of H.P.

National Green Tribunal · Decided on 9 April 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prakash Shrivastava, CP · Sudhir Agarwal, JM · Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
M.A. No.41 Of 2024 In Original Application No. 363 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 325 words
1.

This MA is registered on the basis of the report received in compliance of the order of the Tribunal dated 29.05.2023 passed in OA No.363/2023.

2.

In  the  OA  No.363/2023,  complaint  was  made  that  during  the course of construction of tunnel between Marola and Chintala village muck was generated which was being disposed of in river Satluj polluting the water and damage was caused to the forest and ecology.

3.

Tribunal by order dated 29.05.2023 had formed a Joint Committee comprising of Himachal Pradesh pollution Control Board and District Forest Officer, Shimla with a direction to the Committee to look into the matter, collect relevant information and if any violation is found, take appropriate remedial and prevention actions. OA was accordingly disposed of with a direction to the Committee to submit the report before the Registrar General.

4.

Report submitted before Registrar General by the Committee reveals that EC for damage to the ecology amounting to Rs. 5 lakh for five dumping sites on M/s. Sunni Dam HEP vide letter dated 07.07.2023 has been imposed and that in compliance thereof the unit has deposited Rs. 4 Lakh.

5.

Report further states that during the fresh inspection on 25.07.2023, it was observed that during the monsoon and rise of water level in river Satluj most of the retaining structures were submerged or washed away. Hence, compliance is required to be done on the basis of the report of the Joint Committee and HPPCB is required to ensure the said compliance.

6.

As per the report, project proponent is utilizing the surface water, therefore, Member Secretary, HPPCB will also examine the permissibility/ permission for utilization of such water and if any violation is found, take necessary action in this regard.

7.

Thus, MA is disposed of directing the Member Secretary, HPPCB to take appropriate steps to ensure that compliance in terms of the report of the Joint Committee is done within a period of three months.