High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 02 PAT CK 0045

Md. Raju Khan, Son of Late Wasi Ahmad vs The State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 16 February 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Ravi Ranjan
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
1970 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 243 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

Original records have been produced.

2.

The order has been passed on 24.1.2017 directing the petitioner to remove encroachment. However, it appears that without availing the statutory provision of alternative remedy of appeal, the petitioner filed this writ application.

3.

However, at the same time, it appears that sufficient time was not given to the petitioner for filing an appeal as order was passed on 24.1.2017 and the notice was also issued on the same day under Form II for removal of encroachment on 10.2.2017 whereas Section 11 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 provides that appeal would lie against the order passed by the Collector under the act under Section 6 of the aforesaid Act within 30 days of passing of the order.

4.

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to approach the appellate authority within 30 days from now against the order dated

24.1.2017. He may take all the grounds which would be available to him under law.

5.

Let operation of Annexure 1 would remain stayed till the period of 45 days from today.

6.

In the meantime, the petitioner may file appeal and, thereafter, may file an application before the appellate authority for grant of interim relief which should be considered by the competent authority on its own merit and in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the present order.

7.

This disposes of the writ application.