High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 11 PAT CK 0042

Md. Niyazuddin, Son of Late Majid vs The State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 27 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Birendra Kumar
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
42 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 206 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

This writ application has been preferred for a command to the respondents to take appropriate action against respondent No.4, Manjar who is accused in connection with Araria (Bairgachhi) P.S.Case No. 256 of 2016.

3.

Further prayer is for early conclusion of the investigation of the case.

4.

It has been informed by the State -respondent that after investigation, the police submitted final form in this case, as the matter was not of kidnapping rather of love affairs.

5.

Learned counsel for the private respondent No.4 informed that on receipt of final form, the court below has already taken cognizance in the case. Hence, the case will proceed according to law and this Court is not required to do anything further in this matter.

6.

The petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid position. However, prayer for necessary direction to the authorities for providing security to the petitioner.

7.

The petitioner is at liberty to file a petition before the appropriate authority at the District Level and the authority shall pass necessary order according to law.

8.

In view of the conclusion of the investigation, no persuasion is needed at this level. Hence, this writ application stands disposed of accordingly.