High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 12 JH CK 1888

Md. Fajlu Rahman Ansari, S/o Abdul Majid Ansari vs Eastern Coalfields Limited, through its Chairman cum Managing Director

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 16 December 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ananda Sen, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No.7452 Of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 264 words

Ananda Sen, J

1.

Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner and learned counsel representing the respondents.

2.

By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for direction upon the respondents – Eastern Coalfields Limited (E.C.L.), a subsidiary of Coal India Limited, to issue joining letter in favour of petitioner’s son namely Md. Iqbal Ansari, in terms of the approved Policy, which is known as the Replacement Policy. It has been further prayed that the petitioner’s family should not be discriminated and his son be given appointment.

3.

After hearing the parties, I find that admittedly the petitioner is not an employee of the Eastern Coalfields Limited, nor of the Holding Company i.e. Coal India Limited. He admittedly is the worker of a Government Contractor and General Order Supplier of the Eastern Coalfields Limited, namely Sarif Ansari, which is evident from Annexure-3 to this writ petition, which is a Letter issued by Sarif Ansari to the petitioner, to the effect that the petitioner will superannuate on 31.12.2020. Since the petitioner has superannuated, he now claims that his son has to be employed in terms of some Scheme.

4.

Admittedly, there is no Scheme to suggest that the dependent of a Contractor-employee will be employed in the Eastern Coalfields Limited. Even if there is at all some arrangement / Scheme, that is absolutely in violation of the constitutional provisions. Further, the petitioner has got no right to seek appointment under the Eastern Coalfields Limited or the Coal India Limited. Thus, I find no merit in this writ petition.

5.

Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed.