AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
I.A. No.7800 of 2015 is for impleadment of the District
Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas as respondent. The same is allowed.
There is no rebuttal to the position emerging from the
counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents with regard to the
steps taken for settlement of the post retiral dues including grant of
benefit of ACP or MACP etc. Instead of wasting judicial time, the
petitioner would be well advised to approach the authority, including
Treasury Officer concerned, where authorization has been sent for
processing. It is also obligatory upon him to complete the due
process, if he wants to earn the benefit of authorizations.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the MACP, which
has been given, has not been given rightly and he has serious
reservation about what has been authorized.
It is up to the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the
sanctioning authority, who will verify the position and take remedial
measure, if it is required.
Writ application stands disposed of in view of the above.