High CourtsDivision Bench(2003) 01 PAT CK 0042

Md. Akhtar Hussain vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 16 January 2003 · Citation: (2003) 1 PLJR 647

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi S. Dhavan, C.J · Rajendra Prasad, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
L.P.A. No. 1286 of 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 188 words
1.

The Petitioner is lucky that he had got an order which was passed on the writ petition. Otherwise there was an order of the Supreme Court that regard being had to the circumstances that a scheme has been formulated, the High Court should not be entertaining any cause which may interfere with the scheme formulated and being considered by the Supreme Court in the matter of Bihar Road Transport Corporation.

2.

The Petitioner makes an issue out of the fact whether he has been retired compulsorily or not in the present Letters Patent Appeal. The writ petition was entirely for a different relief. The Petitioner is aware that there is an order of the Supreme Court where the matter relating to the staff and employees of the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation is being monitored.

3.

The Petitioner is lucky that his amount has been quantified. There are other staff and employees of the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation who perhaps are still awaiting to what the Petitioner has got.

4.

This Court is not inclined to interfere with the order on the writ petition.

5.

Dismissed.