High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 09 AP CK 6480

Matte Rajiv Kumar & Ors. vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati · Decided on 29 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No: 27944/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 341 words
1.

The present Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in attempting to interfere with and dispossess the petitioners from their respective agricultural lands admeasuring Ac.8.00 in Sy.No.355/1, Ac.15.76 in Sy.No.355/4 and Ac.22.00 each in Sy.No.355/7, situated at Somavaram Village, Chatrai Mandal, Eluru District, despite the order dated 14.11.2024 in Rc.No.CA/18/2024A passed by the Forest Settlement Officer in favour of the petitioners, without issuing any notice or following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently to direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to interfere with or dispossess the petitioners from their respective lands except by following due process of law.

2.

Heard Sri Pamarthi Kameswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms.K.Siva Jyothi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forests for the respondents.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the respondents herein, who are the Forest Authorities, are interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the subject property.

4.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forests would submit that this matter may be disposed of, at the stage of admission itself, by giving a necessary direction to the respondent-authorities to follow due process of law.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that, in view of the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forests, the present petition may be disposed of at this stage.

6.

Considering the submissions made and without touching the merits of the case, since there are disputed questions of fact with regard to the rights over the subject property, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-authorities are directed to follow due process of law before taking any action in respect of the subject property. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.