High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 02 P&H CK 0198

Manoj Kumar @ Lalu vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 25 February 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lalit Batra, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Main No. 37085 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 369 words

Lalit Batra, J

Present petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C is for grant of regular bail to petitioner-Manoj Kumar @ Lalu in case F.I.R. No.219 dated 25.05.2019 under

Section 136 of Electricity Act, 2003 registered at Police Station Sadar Thanesar, District Kurukshetra.

Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2019 and he is no more required by the Police for any

investigation purpose. He further submits that after completion of investigation, challan has been presented in the Court and trial has already

commenced wherein four prosecution witnesses have already been examined. He further urges that in remaining case FIRs, petitioner has already

been granted concession of bail, vide orders dated 24.10.2019 and 20.11.2019 passed by this Court. He further urges that since trial of the case would

take sufficient time to conclude, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner (accused) in custody further and he may be released on

bail.

On the other hand, learned State counsel while opposing instant petition has vehemently argued that the present FIR was registered on the allegations

that in the intervening night of 22/23.05.2019, transformer installed in the fields of Krishan Lal was stolen by some miscreants due to which loss of

Rs.89, 010/- was caused to the Electricity Department and in view seriousness of offence, petitioner does not deserve the concession of bail.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

At this stage, without commenting anything on the merits of the case lest it may prejudice the outcome of the trial but taking into consideration the fact

that petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2019; that challan has already been presented against the petitioner in the Court; that trial has already

commenced; that since trial of the case would take sufficient time to conclude, no useful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in

custody further and, thus, he deserves the concession of bail.

In view of above, instant petition for grant of regular bail moved by petitioner-Manoj Kumar @ Lalu is allowed. He is ordered to be released on bail on

his furnishing personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Kurukshetra, as the case may be.