High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 04 P&H CK 0164

Dilshad and another vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 April 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Augustine George Masih, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM-M No.7820 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 248 words

AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL)

Petitioners have approached this Court for grant of regular bail by filing the present petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973, in FIR No.0037 dated 04.02.2017, registered at Police Station Ladwa, Kurukshetra, under Section 136 of the Indian Electricity Act.

It is the contention of counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners were arrested on 24.03.2017 and are in custody since then. He contends that the

maximum sentence for the offence which is alleged to have been committed by the petitioners is three years. Petitiones have already undergone

more than one year and out of 16 witnesses, 10 have been examined and 6 witnesses are still left. He contends that the trial is not likely to conclude

in near future and, therefore, the petitioners be granted the concession of bail.

On the other hand, counsel for the State, although could not dispute the custody period and the stage of the trial but contends that there are eight

FIRs against the petitioners and, therefore, the petitioners being habitual offenders, should not be granted the concession of bail.

Having considered the submissions made by the counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that the petitioners have already undergone

more than 1/3rd of the maximum sentence awarded to them, the present petition is allowed, especially when the trial is not likely to conclude in near

future.

Petitioners shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court.