High Courts Division Bench(2022) 02 PAT CK 0044

Manju Devi vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 10 February 2022 · Citation: Court Abbr Caseno Dated Casename Councel File No

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ · S. Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20283 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 186 words

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

We are entertaining the present petition in view of the fact that at this point in time, the Debt Recovery Tribunal is not functional on account of non-

appointment of Presiding Officer.

After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Bench not to be in agreement with the submissions made across the Bar, more so, on the issue

of maintainability, learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner be permitted to approach Respondent No. 3, namely the Branch Manager,

Tata Motors Finance Limited, Purnea for not only obtaining the documents in relation to the Loan Account No. 5003015717 pertaining to the

petitioner’s husband, but also submitting a proposal for One Time Settlement.

Prayer allowed.

We are sure that as and when any such request is made, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law.

It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits. All issues are left open.

Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of.