High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 02 UK CK 0996

Mahakal Bhairav Mandir Trust vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 12 February 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 242 Of 2025 (M/S)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 267 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 1 & 2 to withdraw the Registration (No. UK0606942024013059 dated 15.04.2024) of Society named Sh. Shiv Mandir Samiti, Durga Enclave, Narayan Chowk, Ward No. 60, Dandalakhond, Sahastradhara Road, Dehradun.

2.

Heard Mr. Vinod Nautiyal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2.

3.

Mr. Vinod Nautiyal, Advocate, has cont ended t hat the respondent no. 2 registered Shri Shiv Mandir Samiti on 15.04.2024 for five year s bearing registration no. UK0606942024013059. The petitioner sent a letter dated 17.01.2025 to the respondent no. 2 requesting to cancel the said registration. The said letter dated 17.01.2025 is still pending.

4.

Mr. Vinod Nautiyal, Advocate has requested to dispose of the present writ petition directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the petitioner’s letter dated 17.01.2025.

5.

Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 & 2 has sought six weeks’ time to decide the said letter dated 17.01.2025.

6.

With the consent of learned counsel for both the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the said letter dated 17.01.2025 by a speaking order as expeditiously as possible, but not later than six weeks from the date of production of the certified copy of this order.

7.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.