High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 12 UK CK 0100

Liladhar vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 30 December 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 2100 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 173 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No. 303 of 2024, under Section 304 (2), 305, 317 (2), 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police

Station Kunda, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the alleged recovery is false. The applicant has not snatched any mobile.

4.

Learned State counsel would submit that the applicant could be spotted in the lift while entering in the hospital alongwith the co-accused, but as per

the CCTV record, it is the co-accused who snatched the mobile phone.

5.

Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the Court concerned.