High CourtsDivision Bench(1891) 12 MAD CK 0018

Lakshmi Narasimha vs Atchanna and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 1 December 1891 · Citation: (1892) ILR (Mad) 240

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shephard, J · Parker, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 97 words
1.

The ruling in Radha Charan v. Man Singh ILR 12 All. 392 has never been adopted as the correct view of the law in this Presidency, see

Ramanadan v. Periatambi ILR 6 Mad. 250 or in Calcutta and Bombay, see Wajihan alias Alijan v. Bishwanath Parshad ILR 18 Cal. 462 and

Shankar Bisto Nadgir v. Narsinghrao Ramchandra ILR 11 Bom. 467--and we cannot follow it.

2.

The order of the Subordinate Judge must be set aside and that of District Munsif restored. Appellant is entitled to his costs in this and in the

Lower Appellate Court.