High Courts(1891) 12 MAD CK 0011

Dronam Raju Lakshmi Narasimha Row Pantulu vs Damoji Purappu Atchanna Pantulu and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 1 December 1891 · Citation: (1896) 6 MLJ 774

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 105 words
1.

The ruling quoted, Badhacharan v. Man Singh ILR (1890) A. 392 has never been adopted in the courts either of this or of the other

Presidencies, see Ramanadhaii Chetti v. Periatambi Shervai ILR (1883) M. 250; Wajihan v. Bishivanath ILR (1887) B. 457 and Rada Krishen

Lall v. Bada Per shad Singh ILR (1891) C 462; Shankara Bisto Nadgir v. Narsing Rao Ramachandra ILR (1891) C 517 and we cannot follow it.

The order of the Subordinate Judge must be set aside and that of the District Munsif restored. The appellant is entitled to his costs in this and in the

Lower Appellate Court.