AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Suresh Kumar Monga, Member (J)
An order dated 20th July, 2015 was issued by the Inland Waterways Authority of India (hereinafter called as the ""Respondent Authority""), which
led the applicant to invoke the jurisdiction of this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (for short ""Act No.13 of 1985"").
A perusal of the order dated 25th July, 2015 reveals that pursuant to observations made by the Internal Audit Party, the Respondent Authority
proceeded to re-fix the applicant's pay in supersession of all previous orders on stepping-up of pay/fixation of pay and grant of increments w.e.f.
25.2.1993 onwards.
On Notice, the Respondents filed a short reply disputing the jurisdiction of this Tribunal to entertain the present Original Application stating therein
that the Respondent Authority is an autonomous body which has not been notified under Section 14 (2) of the 'Act No.13 of 1985'. A prayer for
dismissal of the Original Application has, thus, been made for want of jurisdiction.
The applicant by way of filing rejoinder to short reply, apart from reiterating the facts narrated in the Original Application, has further stated that the
Ministry of Surface Transport was a branch of the Government of India. It was the apex body for the formulation and administration of the policies,
rules, regulations and laws relating to surface transport in India. The Department of Surface Transport, within the Ministry of Transport, was renamed
as the Ministry of Surface Transport with effect from 22.10.1986. The next development was that this Ministry was reorganized into the Department
of Shipping and the Department of Road Transport and Highways on 15.10.1991. The ministry was bifurcated into the Ministry of Shipping and the
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, with effect from 17.11.2000. It is the contention of the applicant that basically respondents No.2 and 3 are
under the Ministry of Surface Transport, which has undergone changes in its nomenclature over the years.
It has further been averred that the Ministry of Surface Transport has figured at Sr. No. 36 of the list of organizations under the jurisdiction of this
Tribunal. The Respondent Authority is a statutory body created by an independent Act of Parliament viz. The Inland Waterways Authority of India
Act, 1985, (for short ""Act No.82 of 1985""), unlike corporations and local bodies / authorities / societies which are created under the Umbrella Acts
such as Companies Act 1956, Societies Act, 1860 and some other executive orders. Section 11 of the Act No.82 of 1985 denotes the transfer of
assets and liabilities of the Central Government for the purposes of inland water transport. The Inland Water Transport Directorate in the Ministry of
Surface Transport, having a Director's office in Patna and Allahabad, by virtue of part of the Ministry of Surface Transport was under the jurisdiction
of this Tribunal. The applicant has thus reiterated that this Tribunal has the jurisdiction to entertain the present Original Application.
We have considered the rival contentions raised on behalf of the parties on the issue of maintainability of the Original Application.
By virtue of Article 46 of the Constitution (Forty-Second Amendment) Act, 1976, Part-XIVA was incorporated in the Indian Constitution which
also included Article 323-A for establishing the Administrative Tribunals. As per the provisions of Article 323-A of the Indian Constitution, Parliament
may, by law, provide for the adjudication or trial by Administrative Tribunals of disputes and complaints with respect to recruitment and conditions of
service of persons appointed to public services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or of any State or of any local or other authority
within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India or of any Corporation owned or controlled by the Government. Clause (2)
sub-clause (b) of the said Article further makes a provision that the law enacted by the Parliament shall specify the jurisdiction, powers and authority
which may be exercised by the Tribunals so established. The Indian Parliament while enacting the Act No.13 of 1985 in terms of Article 323-A of the
Constitution of India, while keeping in view the provisions of Clause 2 sub-clause (b) of the said Article has incorporated Section 14 (2) and (3) in the
said Act stipulating therein that the Central Government may, by notification, apply with effect from such date as may be specified in the notification,
the provisions of sub-section (3) to local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India and to
corporations or societies owned or controlled by the Government.
Section 14(1) of the Act No.13 of 1985 has explicitly enumerated the jurisdiction, powers and authority of this Tribunal in relation to recruitment,
and matters concerning recruitment to any All-India Service or to any civil service of the Union or a civil post under the Union or to a post filled by the
civilian in the defence services and all service matters concerning a member of any All-India Services etc.
There is no dispute with regard to the fact that the case in hand does not fall in any of the categories of services enumerated in Section 14 (1) of
the Act No.13 of 1985.
Section 14 (3) of the Act No.13 of 1985 further makes a provision that this Tribunal shall also exercise its jurisdiction to any local or other authority
or corporation or society. However, in terms of Section 14 (2), a notification is required to be issued by the Central Government specifying therein the
names of the local or other authorities under the control of the Government of India and the Corporations or Societies owned or controlled by
Government as referred to in Section 14 (3) of the said Act.
So far as the Respondent Authority is concerned, it is a creation of the Act No. 82 of 1985. The said Act was enacted by the Indian Parliament to
provide for the constitution of an Authority for the regulation and development of inland waterways for the purposes of shipping and navigation and for
matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. There is no dispute with regard to the fact that the Respondent Authority has been incorporated and
established under the provisions of Section 3 of the Act No. 82 of 1985. It is a body Corporate by the name of Inland Waterways Authority of India,
having its perpetual succession and a common seal with power to acquire, hold and dispose of the properties both movable and immovable and to
contract and can also sue and be sued by the said name. It is an autonomous body.
In our considered view, unless and until name of the Respondent Authority is included in the list, notified by the Central Government under section
14 (2) of the Act No.13 of 1985, this Tribunal cannot entertain an Original Application against it. Undisputedly, uptill now the name of Respondent
Authority has not been included in the said list notified under Section 14 (2) of the Act No.13 of 1985.
In the conspectus of discussions made hereinabove, we hold that this Tribunal does not have the power, authority or jurisdiction to adjudicate upon
the mater brought against the Respondent Authority and, therefore the Original Application is liable to be returned to the applicant enabling him to
present the same before the competent forum having jurisdiction over the matter.
Accordingly, the Registry is directed to return the Original Application to the applicant enabling him to present the same before the competent
forum having jurisdiction over the matter.