High Courts(1923) 08 MAD CK 0009

K.P.S. Karuthian Chettiar vs R.M.M. Raman Chetty

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 August 1923 · Citation: AIR 1924 Mad 400(1)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 132 words
1.

The application has been made nearly 3 years after the order sought to be appealed against was passed. It is contended that Section 5 of the

Indian Limitation Act cannot be applied, because Section 78 of Act V of 1920 conferred a new right after the inception of these insolvency

proceedings. We consider that this section did not create for the first time or take away any substantive right, but that it merely regulated the

procedure applicable to appeals and applications under the Provincial Insolvency Act. We have therefore power to accuse the delay and the fact

that leave to appeal was not necessary under the old Act (III of 1907) is a sufficient reason for doing so.

2.

Leave to appeal is granted u/s 75(3) of Act V of 1920.