High CourtsDivision Bench(1923) 08 MAD CK 0048

K.P.S. Karuthan Chettiar vs B.M.M. Raman Chetty

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 August 1923 · Citation: AIR 1924 Mad 185 : 80 Ind. Cas. 376

HON’BLE JUDGES
Spencer, J · Devadoss, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 133 words
1.

The application has been made nearly 3 years after the order sought to be appealed against was passed.

2.

It is contended that Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act cannot he applied, because Section 78 of Act V of 1920 conferred a new right after

the inception of these insolvency proceedings. We consider that this section did not create for the first time or take away any substantive right, but

that it merely regulated the procedure applicable to appeals and applications under the Provincial Insolvency Act.

3.

We have, therefore, power to excuse delay, and the fact that leave to appeal was not necessary under the old Act (III of 1907) is a sufficient

reason for doing so.

4.

Leave to appeal is granted u/s 75(3) of Act V of 1920.