Tribunals and CommissionsFull Bench(1943) 11 FED CK 0001

Keshav Talpade vs Emperor

Federal Court · Decided on 2 November 1943 · Citation: AIR 1944 FC 24

HON’BLE JUDGES
Justice Petrick Spens C.J ,Justice Srinivasa Varadachariar ,Justice Muhammad Zafrulla Khan JJ

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 268 words
1.

This appeal arises out of an application for a writ of habeas corpus made by the appellant to the Bombay High Court in February 1943. The

matter had come before this Court on two previous occasions in April See (''43) 30 A.I.R. 1943 F.C. 1 and May See (''43) 30 A.I.R. 1943 F.C.

72.

1943, but the orders of this Court on those occasions did not finally dispose of the matter. By its order dated 2nd July 1943, the High Court

(by a majority judgment) dismissed the application and this appeal has been preferred against that order. The appellant takes exception to the

grounds on which the High Court has rested its judgment, including its view as to the effect of the orders of this Court. But it is admitted that the

appellant has already been released. This appeal was filed on 10th August and it is stated by the Advocate-General of Bombay that the appellant

was released on that very day, though it is not quite clear whether the order of release was passed on that date or the appellant was in fact set free

on that date. As the appellant is no longer in custody, his learned counsel admits that no order can hereafter be made on the habeas corpus

application; but he nevertheless asks us to pronounce an opinion on the correctness of the High Court''s judgment. We do not see our way to

adopt any such course. All that can be done at this stage is to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no order on the application can now be made.