High CourtsDivision Bench(1922) 02 BOM CK 0010

Kasturbhai Manibhai Nagarseth vs Hiralal D. Nanavati

Bombay High Court · Decided on 27 February 1922 · Citation: AIR 1923 Bom 23(1) : (1922) 24 BOMLR 350

HON’BLE JUDGES
Norman Macleod, J · Coyajee, J
CASE NUMBER
Application in O.C.J. Appeal No. 88 of 1921

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 102 words

Norman Macleod, C.J.—We think that in this case a certificate to appeal to His Majesty''s Privy Council must be granted. The plaintiff''s seek to eject their tenant in order that they may occupy the premises themselves; while the tenant seeks the protection of the Bombay Rent Act. The decree, therefore, allowing possession of the tenancy involves directly a claim or question to or respecting property over Rs. 10,000, as the monthly rent of the premises is Rs. 275 and capitalised at twenty years'' purchase the value of the property will be over Rs. 10,000.

2.

Costs to be costs in the appeal.