High CourtsDivision Bench(1922) 02 BOM CK 0022

Hiralal D. Nanavati vs Kasturbhai Manibhai Nagarseth and Others

Bombay High Court · Decided on 27 February 1922 · Citation: 67 Ind. Cas. 938

HON’BLE JUDGES
Norman Macleod, C.J · Coyajee, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 101 words
1.

We think that in this case a certificate to appeal to His Majesty''s Privy Council most be granted. The plaintiffs seek to eject their tenant in order that they may occupy the premises themselves, while the tenant seeks the protection of the Bombay Rent Act. The decree, therefore, allowing possession of the tenancy involves directly a claim or question to or respecting property over Rs. 10,000, as the monthly rent of the premises is Rs. 275 and capitalised at twenty years purchase the value of the property will be over Rs. 10,000.

2.

Costs to be costs in the appeal.