High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 09 TEL CK 3993

Kandala Anantha Padmanabha Yeshwanth vs The State Of Telangana & Anr.

Telangana High Court, Hyderabad · Decided on 23 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Aparesh Kumar Singh, C.J · Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No.32031 OF 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 235 words

ORDER:

Mr. L. Ram Singh, learned counsel appears for the petitioner. Mr. R. Nagarjuna Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, appears for respondent No.1.

Mr. T. Sharath, learned Standing Counsel for Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, appears for respondent No.2.

2.

This Writ Petition is filed for the following relief:

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner could not deposit the requisite amount within the time stipulated for admission into MBBS course for the academic year 2026-27, due to financial hardship. He further submitted that the petitioner preferred a representation before respondent No.2-University on 21.09.2026, but the same has not yet been considered. He further submitted that respondent No.2-University be directed to decide the said representation in a time bound manner.

4.

Learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2-University submitted that the petitioner’s representation shall be dealt with by respondent No.2-University in accordance with law.

5.

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2-University to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 21.09.2026 as per the grounds taken in it and in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned order before the next counselling. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

______________________________

APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ

__________________________________