High CourtsSingle Bench(2004) 01 AP CK 0007

K. Jayaraj vs Executive Officer, Cantonment Board

Andhra Pradesh High Court · Decided on 8 January 2004 · Citation: (2005) 5 ALD 1 : (2004) 4 ALT 58

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.V. Ramulu, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 558 of 2004

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 176 words

C.V. Ramulu, J.—This writ petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not releasing the balance subsistence allowance payable to the petitioner during the period of suspension i.e., from 28-11-2000 to 27-5-2003 as arbitrary and illegal.

2.

Earlier, the petitioner was removed from service and he was imposed punishment with retrospective effect. On appeal filed by the petitioner, the appellate authority on 26-11-2003 had modified the said order of dismissal to be effected from 27-5-2003 and the subsistence allowance already paid to him shall not be recovered. Even against this order, the petitioner filed a revision before the revisional authority. At this stage, the petitioner filed present writ petition and complains that his subsistence allowance during the pendency of the enquiry by the disciplinary authority was not paid as per law. Such a petition is not maintainable and he is supposed to work out the remedies either in the appeal or in the revision petition pending before the revisional authority. The writ petition is misconceived and it is, accordingly, dismissed.