High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 03 PAT CK 0052

Jitendra Mistri vs The State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 18 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Kumar Singh
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
10701 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

33 paragraphs · 343 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The present writ application has been filed for quashing

the notice dated 30.6.2015 issued by respondent no. 5, the Circle

Officer, Fatuha, whereby twenty eight persons including the petitioner

whose name appear at serial number 14 of the notice as contained in

Annexure 1, have been directed to file documents with regard to their

claim over the land appertaining to Thana No. 20, Khata No. 60, Plot

No. 508 area 0.29 decimals situated in Mauza Mirjapur Nauhatta.

3.

It appears that the said notice was issued in pursuance to

some order passed in the writ application filed with regard to encroachment of Kabristan.

4.

It is submitted by learned senior counsel for the

petitioner that the petitioner and others are keeping their wooden

shops (Gumti) in between the land of the flank of the road and

Kabristan though the petitioners and others have made payment of

rupees five thousand each for running shops to the Kabristan Suraksha

Samiti. The report of the Notified Area Committee as contained in

Annexure 3 suggests that the wooden shops are in between the land of

Kabristan and the flank of the road and the shopkeepers used to pay

certain amount per day to the local contractor.

5.

Learned counsel for the respondent State submits that

simply notice has been issued and the authorities have directed the

petitioner and others to produce documentary evidence with regard to

their claim over the land in question.

6.

Considering the rival submission of the parties, this

court is not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage. However, it

is expected from respondent no. 5 the Circle Officer, Fatuha, Patna to

conclude the proceeding if it has already not been concluded in

accordance with law after giving notice to all affected persons,

preferably, within a period of three months. It is expected from the

petitioner to appear regularly till the conclusion of the proceeding.

7.

Till then, status quo, as existing today, shall be

maintained.

8.

The writ application stands disposed of.