High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 03 PAT CK 0052

Jitendra Mistri vs The State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 18 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Kumar Singh
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
10701 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 343 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The present writ application has been filed for quashing the notice dated 30.6.2015 issued by respondent no. 5, the Circle Officer, Fatuha, whereby twenty eight persons including the petitioner whose name appear at serial number 14 of the notice as contained in Annexure 1, have been directed to file documents with regard to their claim over the land appertaining to Thana No. 20, Khata No. 60, Plot

No. 508 area 0.29 decimals situated in Mauza Mirjapur Nauhatta.

3.

It appears that the said notice was issued in pursuance to some order passed in the writ application filed with regard to encroachment of Kabristan.

4.

It is submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner and others are keeping their wooden shops (Gumti) in between the land of the flank of the road and Kabristan though the petitioners and others have made payment of rupees five thousand each for running shops to the Kabristan Suraksha Samiti. The report of the Notified Area Committee as contained in Annexure 3 suggests that the wooden shops are in between the land of Kabristan and the flank of the road and the shopkeepers used to pay certain amount per day to the local contractor.

5.

Learned counsel for the respondent State submits that simply notice has been issued and the authorities have directed the petitioner and others to produce documentary evidence with regard to their claim over the land in question.

6.

Considering the rival submission of the parties, this court is not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage. However, it is expected from respondent no. 5 the Circle Officer, Fatuha, Patna to conclude the proceeding if it has already not been concluded in accordance with law after giving notice to all affected persons, preferably, within a period of three months. It is expected from the petitioner to appear regularly till the conclusion of the proceeding.

7.

Till then, status quo, as existing today, shall be maintained.

8.

The writ application stands disposed of.