Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2019) 05 CAT CK 0048

Jitendra Kumar (OBC) And Ors vs Union Of India Trough

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 6 May 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · Aradhana Johri, J
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 2044 Of 2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 265 words

L. Narasimha Reddy, J

1.

In this O.A., the applicants seek relief in relation to the recruitment to the post of Sub Inspector (Executive) in Delhi Police. The dispute in the present O.A. is as to whether the applicants, who are internal candidates and have crossed the age of 30 years, are  entitled to participate in the selection process. The Recruitment Rules were amended reducing the age from 40 to 30 years.

2.

The O.A. has undergone several changes. It was adjourned sine die at one stage, noticing that identical issue is pending consideration before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Today, we have taken up the O.A. to take into account various developments.

3.

The issue involved in the O.A. was dealt with by this Tribunal in O.A. No.1650/2013 and it was decided in favour of the applicants therein. However, the applicants were not satisfied with those directions and they filed W.P. (C) No.2034/2015. That was decided on 20.04.2017. Thereagain, the writ petitioners therein were not satisfied and filed SLP No.23256/2017 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which is said to be pending adjudication. On another issue also, which is raised in this O.A., the adjudication is taking place in W.P. (C) No.10008/2018.

4.

When  the  issues  involved  in  this  O.A.  are  under consideration by the Hon'ble High Court and Hon'ble Supreme Court, we find it difficult to adjudicate the same.

5.

We, therefore, close the O.A. leaving it open to the applicants to work out their remedies depending upon the outcome in SLP No.23256/2017 and W.P. (C) No.10008/2018.

There shall be no order as to costs.