High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 12 PAT CK 0001

Jeetan Mahto vs District Board Jamui

Patna High Court · Decided on 1 December 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Purnendu Singh, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2541 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 201 words
1.

Let the hard copy of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent be kept on the record.

2.

Heard Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. Anwar Karim, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Zila Parishad and Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, learned GA-2, along with Mr. Binay Kr. Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

3.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are ready to deposit the rent fixed by the rent controller will be paid within six weeks, which will be subject to the final result of the appeal filed by the Zila Parishad.

4.

Considering the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioners that for the entire period the rent is due, as claimed by the Zila Parishad, will be paid by the petitioners within a period of six weeks. The petitioners, after depositing the rent may file its acknowledgment before the Appellate Court, as well as, before the executive officer of the Zila Parishad.

5.

The amount deposited by the petitioner will be subject to the final outcome of the Appeal.

6.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.