High CourtsDivision Bench(2002) 12 PAT CK 0018

Jai Prakash and Others vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 17 December 2002 · Citation: (2003) 1 PLJR 563

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi S. Dhavan, C.J · R.N. Prasad, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
L.P.A. No. 159 of 1995

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 196 words
1.

This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the order of 1 February 1995 on CWJC No. 1931 of 1994: Jai Prakash and Ors v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

2.

Two issues are noticed in the order which has been challenged. The learned Judge mentions that in case there was a matter of discretion then the Petitioner could have been replaced by removing discrimination and taking the place of those who had got the advantage of promotion. But, this is not the case. The second aspect is of the date when promotion will take effect with its consequential effect on emoluments. The learned Judge says that the promotion will take effect from the date it is granted. The contention of the Petitioners was that the promotion will take effect as from the date of the sanctioned posts and not from the date of the promotion order. This is stretching a point too far. Promotion cannot be retrospective but from the date when it is granted. Even promotion itself is a managerial function and it cannot be made retrospectively as the Petitioners so desire. The court finds no merit in this appeal.

3.

Dismissed.