High CourtsDivision Bench(1918) 01 PAT CK 0001

Jaggarnath Pershad vs Chitragupta Narain Singh

Patna High Court · Decided on 15 January 1918 · Citation: 48 Ind. Cas. 141

HON’BLE JUDGES
Roe, J · Jwala Prasad, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 139 words
1.

In this case the learned Subordinate Judge has directed that the value of the property should be reckoned at twenty times the Government Revenue. This we can regard only as a colourable pretence of exercising the jurisdiction vested in him by law to ascertain the actual value of the property and record it in the sale proclamation. We should have been willing to ascertain the value for ourselves, but the learned Vakil for the decree-holder asks for a remand that the matter may be properly enquired into. We, therefore, direct the learned Subordinate Judge to ascertain the value of this property by a reference to the rent-roll and to the Record of Rights showing, the extent of the ziraits and bakasht lands of the village. The application is allowed. The decree-holder will pay the costs of the hearing.