High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 08 UK CK 0043

Ishrat vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 21 August 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Habeas Corpus No. 11 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 211 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

The instant habeas corpus petition was filed to get the corpus of the victim, in FIR No. 257 of 2020, Police Station Gangnahar, District Haridwar.

The victim, whose corpus is sought to be produced is daughter of the petitioner.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

3.

The Investigating Officer, Ms. Prema Kandpal also joins us through video conferencing and tells thatc orpus has been located and she produced

the corpus before the Court through Video Conferencing only.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the daughter of the petitioner has been located and she is with the petitioner now. He identified

the daughter of the victim, through video conferencing alongwith the Investigation Officer of the case.

5.

During the course of hearing in this case, IO was directed to produce the corpus. On 30.07.2020, the IO Ms. Prema Kandpal had assisted the

Court in the matter and given useful information. The IO Ms. Prema Kandpal has shown her sincerity and efforts in the matter.

6.

Since, the daughter of the victim has been traced and she is with the petitioner now for which this habeas corpus petition has been filed, nothing

survives in this petition and it stands disposed of accordingly.