High CourtsSingle Bench(1923) 03 AHC CK 0074

Ishdatt Tewari and Another vs Tameshar Tewari and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 20 March 1923 · Citation: AIR 1924 All 175 : 83 Ind. Cas. 780

HON’BLE JUDGES
Piggott, J
RESULT
Allowed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 123 words

Piggott, J.—I have considered the Office Report and the arguments of Counsel. The cross-objections are admittedly liable to an ad valorem fee on the subject-matter in dispute This can only be ascertained by an examination of the decrees passed by the Courts below the First Court dismissed the plaintiff''s suit: the lower Appellate Court gave the plaintiff Ishdatt a decree be qadr jaedad maliyat mubligh Rs. 100-10". The defendants, in their petition of cross-objections, ask for the restoration of the First Court''s decree. I hold that the value of the subject-matter in dispute on their petition of cross-objections is Rs. 100-10: they must pay an ad valorem fee on this amount. I allow them one month within which to make good the deficiency.