High CourtsSingle Bench(1923) 03 AHC CK 0054

Ishdat Tiwari and Another vs Tameshwar Tiwari and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 20 March 1923 · Citation: (1923) ILR (All) 537

HON’BLE JUDGES
Piggott, J
RESULT
Allowed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 125 words

Piggott, J.—I have considered the office report and the arguments of counsel. The cross-objections are admittedly liable to an ad valorem fee on the subject matter in dispute. This can only be ascertained by an examination of the decrees passed by the courts below. The first court dismissed the plaintiffs'' suit: the lower appellate court gave the plaintiff Ishdat a decree "ba qadr jaedad maliyat mubligh Rs. 100-10-0." The defendants in their petition of cross-objections ask for the restoration of the first court''s decree. I hold that the value of the subject matter in dispute on their petition of cross-objections is Rs. 100-10-0: they must pay an ad valorem fee on this amount. I allow them one month within which to make good the deficiency.