Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2021) 06 CAT CK 0501

Iqbal vs Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam · Decided on 23 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Madhavan, Judicial Member · K.V. Eapen, Administrative Member
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 180/267/2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 348 words

Hon'ble Mr. P. Madhavan, Judicial Member -

Heard Advocate Mr. Saju Wahab appearing for the applicant, Advocate Mr. Anil Ravi, ACGSC appearing for respondent No. 1, Advocate Mr. Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil, appearing for respondents Nos. 2 & 3 and Advocate Mr. M. Rajeev, GP appearing for respondents Nos. 4 & 5, through video conferencing.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that the applicant was working as an Assistant Superintendent of Police (Non-IPS) in the State Police Service and retired from service on superannuation on 30.04.2020. The applicant submits that for the years 2019 and 2020 he is eligible and entitled to be selected and appointed by promotion to the Indian Police Service. However, since he retired from service on superannuation on 30.4.2020 and because of the delay in convening the meeting there is a likelihood that he will be excluded from the selection and promotion to IPS (Appointment by promotion) for having retired. The applicant filed this OA seeking the following reliefs:

"(i)

Direct respondents 1 to 3 to consider the applicant for selection and appointment to Indian Police Service for the years 2020 notwithstanding the retirement of the applicant from service on 30.4.2020.

(ii)

Issue such other appropriate direction or order this Tribunal may deem fit and order in the interest of justice."

3.

When the matter came up for consideration today, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the effect that his retirement from service on superannuation will not be a bar for considering his promotion to IPS cadre for the vacancies of 2019 and 2020.

4.

In view of the limited relief sought, without going into the merits of the case, we direct that the retirement of the applicant from State Service will not be a bar for considering his promotion to the IPS cadre in the vacancies of 2019 and 2020, if he is eligible otherwise as per rules and regulations existing.

5.

The Original Application is disposed of as above at the admission stage itself. No order as to costs.