High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 06 JH CK 0024

Indra Deo Pandey vs Union Of India & Ors

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 20 June 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Aparesh Kumar Singh
CASE NUMBER
2496 of 2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 492 words
1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the writ application, certificate proceedings have been initiated before the Certificate Officer cum Additional Collector (Supply), Dhanbad being Certificate Case No. 01(WC)/2015-16 for recovery of the amount of gratuity of Rs. 50,385/- in terms of the impugned order dated 21.01.2013 passed by the Learned Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Dhanbad (Respondent No. 2) cum Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Controlling Authority had accepted the grounds urged by the petitioner for deduction of the amount of

Rs. 50,385/- on account of wrong fixation of pay from the gratuity of the employee / Respondent No. 4. However, the Appellate Authority has, without appreciation of the relevant materials and grounds, set aside the order of the Controlling Authority, by directing payment of the deducted amount to the Respondent No. 4 employee by the impugned order. It is submitted that the Respondents have already been noticed and have entered appearance through their counsel as well. He therefore seeks to incorporate an amendment also through prayer made in I.A. No. 4320/2015, challenging the notice dated 15.04.2015 issued by the Certificate Officer cum Additional Collector (Supply), Dhanbad. It is submitted that if the impugned notice is not stayed, petitioner may suffer irreparable injury.

3.

No one appears on behalf of the Respondents today.

4.

Considered the submissions of the counsel for the petitioner in the light of the prayer made in the interlocutory applications. The prayer for amendment is allowed.

Counsel for the petitioner shall incorporate the proposed amendment at para-8 of I.A.

No. 4320/2015, so far as it relates to the quashing of notice dated 15.04.2015, issued by the Certificate Officer cum Additional Collector (Supply), Dhanbad in Certificate Case No. 01(WC)/2015-16, at para-1 and prayer portion of the writ petition in red ink during course of the day. Let the Certificate Officer cum Additional Collector (Supply), Dhanbad be also impleaded as Respondent No. 6 in the instant writ petition.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would serve copies of the amended writ petition again on the learned counsel representing the State to enable him to seek instruction on the newly added prayer also. I.A. No. 4320/2015 stands disposed of accordingly.

I.A. Nos. 676/2015 & 4321/2015

5.

Having considered the interim prayer made on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to direct the petitioner to deposit the amount of Rs. 50,385/- with the Certificate Officer cum Additional Collector (Supply), Dhanbad within a period of two weeks from today. However, such deposit would be subject to outcome of the writ petition. If such deposit is made before the Certificate Officer cum Additional Collector (Supply), Dhanbad within the aforesaid period, the Respondent Certificate Officer would not take any coercive steps against the petitioner. However, the amount so deposited, shall not be disbursed without the leave of this Court. I.A. Nos. 676/2015 and 4321/2015 stand disposed of.