High CourtsFull Bench(1913) 03 MAD CK 0035

In Re: Solai Goundan and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 13 March 1913 · Citation: (1914) ILR (Mad) 153

HON’BLE JUDGES
Charles Arnold White, C.J · Tyabji, J · Sankaran Nair, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 175 words
1.

We are of opinion that the jurisdiction of an Appellate Court to order a person who has been convicted of one of the offences mentioned in

Sub-section (1) of Section 106 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is not restricted to cases where the conviction was by one of the Courts

specified in the sub-section. The, words ""an Appellate Court"" are quite general and the word ""also"" indicate, that the powers given by the section

may be exercised by the Courts mentioned in Sub-section (1) and by any Appellate Court.

2.

We think the words ""under this section"" in Sub-section (3) have reference to the powers given by the section and not to the Courts by which

these powers are, in the first instance, exercise-able. ""We are unable to agree with the decision in Muthiah Chetti v. Emperor ILR (1906) Mad.

190 and in the other cases referred to in the order of reference in which that decision was followed. We would answer the question which has

been referred to us in the affirmative.