High CourtsDivision Bench(1917) 12 CAL CK 0025

Karim Buksh and Another vs Emperor

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 7 December 1917 · Citation: 43 Ind. Cas. 796

HON’BLE JUDGES
Smither, J · Chitty, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 131 words
1.

There is a decision of this Court, Emperor v. Momin Malita 35 C. 434pc : 7 C.L.J. 602 : 12 C.W.N 752 : 4 M.L.T. 340 : 8 Cri. L.J. 9, that an Appellate Court cannot exercise the power given by Section 106(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, where the conviction has not been by a Court specified in Sub-section (1). Having regard to the fact that amendment of the Code is under contemplation it does not appear to be worthwhile to refer the question to a Full Bench, though the decisions in the Madras and Bombay High Courts are to the contrary effect. We accordingly, without expressing an opinion on the subject, make the rule absolute and set aside the order u/s 106(3) in this case. Rule made absolute.