High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 05 P&H CK 0025

Heena And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 28 May 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Avneesh Jhingan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 4520 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 222 words

Avneesh Jhingan, J

The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

This petition was filed for issuance of directions to the official respondents for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners from the private

respondents arrayed in the petition.

As per the pleadings, the petitioners had performed marriage against the wishes of their parents, hence, there is a threat perception.

On 18th May, 2021, the following order was passed:-

“ The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only at this stage.

Ms. Monika Jalota, DAG, Punjab, appearing on advance notice accepts the same and seeks time to have instructions.

Put up on 28th May, 2021.

In the meantime, the police officials not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police should record the statements of the petitioners.

In case a request is made by the petitioners, they may be provided shelter in safe house till the next date.''

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Vijay Kumar submits that the statements of the petitioners have been recorded by Mr. Davinder

Singh, DSP. It is stated therein that there is no threat perception.

In view of above, no cause of action survives for pursuing the present petition.

Disposed of as infructuous.