Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2023) 07 CAT CK 3820

Girish Chandra vs Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 28 July 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Ojha, Member (J)
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 332/00269/2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 205 words

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant would be satisfied if this O.A. is disposed of by giving permission to the applicant to file a fresh representation for ventilating his grievance with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the said representation filed by the applicant by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time to be fixed by this Tribunal, to which learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.

3.

Keeping in view the innocuous prayer made by the applicant, this O.A. is disposed of finally, without going into the merits of the case, with a direction to the applicant to prefer a fresh representation within two weeks from today and respondents/ competent authority shall consider and decide the said representation of the applicant within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of such representation in accordance with law and relevant rules by passing a reasoned and speaking order under intimation to the applicant.

4.

The O.A. stands disposed of as above with no order as to costs.