AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
PER HON’BLE JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR OJHA, MEMBER (J)
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
Delay condoned.
Through this OA, applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“1- To revise the pay of the applicant after fixing it in GP 4200 from the due date and also after granting GP 2800 as on 06.05.2006 and GP 4200 as on 05.05.2008 and release arrears thereof after revision of pay.
2- Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit, just and proper under the circumstance of the case, may also be passed.
4- Cost of the present case.”
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the instant O.A. may be disposed of as applicant is only seeking decision on the representation preferred by him and ends of justice would be served if a direction is given by this Tribunal to the respondents / competent authority to consider and dispose of the pending representation of the applicant dated 14.11.2025 attached as Annexure No. A-5 (page- 20-21) to this OA by way of a reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.
Learned counsel for the respondents orally opposed, however, submitted that in case the applicant’s representation is directed to be decided in the manner suggested then for the same at least two months’ time may be allowed.
In view of the above submissions, respondents / competent authority are directed to consider and decide the representation of the applicant dated 14.11.2025 attached as Annexure No. A-5 (page- 20) to this OA by passing a reasoned and speaking order as per law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order under intimation to the applicant forthwith.
Merits of the case has not been touched upon by this Tribunal.
The OA is disposed of accordingly.
There is no order as to costs.