High CourtsSingle Bench(1931) 05 J&K CK 0001

Fattu vs Firm Kirpa Ram Beli Ram

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 1 May 1931

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.J.Dalal, C.J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Revision No. 59 of 1987

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 127 words

There is nothing in his application for revision. On the date fixed for hearing defendant Fattu, applicant's witnesses were not present. He expressed

no desire to have the witnesses summoned. Two witnesses were summoned but their summons were not served and they did not appear. The

other witnesses whom Fattu promised to bring along with him were not brought. It is the business of the party to see that summons are properly

served on his witnesses. It is not enough for him to pay the produces fee and then take it easy at his home. I see no reason to give Fattu another

opportunity of producing witnesses. Most likely having had time he will produce false witnesses.

This application is dismissed without any order as to costs.