High CourtsDivision Bench(2002) 12 PAT CK 0097

Dr. Shashi Kumar Gupta vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 20 December 2002 · Citation: (2003) 3 PLJR 167

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi S. Dhavan, C.J · R.N. Prasad, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
L.P.A. No. 1311 of 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 194 words
1.

The Petitioner-Appellant is a State doctor. He filed a writ petition resisting his transfer. This is CWJC No. 7481 of 2002. The learned judge by his order dated 24 July 2002 declined to interfere.

2.

The Petitioner-Appellant acknowledges that the order of transfer is a general transfer order issued on 29 June 2002 (Annexure-2). The order of transfer which has been indicated to the Petitioner-Appellant is neither mala fide nor spiteful. The fact that the Petitioner-Appellant may not have received his salary as of date, it is more than 10 months since the order of transfer was passed, is a situation of his own making. Learned judge has committed no error in not granting any reliefs to the Petitioner-Appellant.

3.

This Court has hesitation in recording that if the Petitioner-Appellant does not join his duties at the place where he is being transferred, this may be taken as a circumstance on record as subversive to discipline in service. Further a comment needs to be recorded that the Petitioner-Appellant deliberately filed this letters patent appeal belatedly as if to portray a circumstance that a matter may be subjudice on a belated appeal.

4.

Dismissed.